Skip to main content
Baseball Predictor
Back to Schedule
Final 2-0 Wrigley Field
PIT
Pittsburgh Pirates
Carmen Mlodzinski
2
@
CHC
Chicago Cubs
Shota Imanaga
0
2026-04-10 · 18:20 UTC

Predictions

Cross-Model Agreement

moneyline 2 of 3 agree (home)
run line All 3 models agree (home)
over under All 3 models agree (under)
AI Baseline (Sonnet) LLM
moneyline 45% LOW The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
HOME
Edge: -14.0% Our model's probability minus the sportsbook's implied probability. Higher edge = bigger perceived advantage over the market. Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. LOST

"Shota Imanaga's career-level command and control (1.01 WHIP, 1.56 BB/9) give the Cubs a significant pitching advantage over Mlodzinski, whose small 2026 sample and elevated WHIP (1.56) suggest vulnerability."

run line 24% NO EDGE The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
HOME -1.5
Edge: -13.9% Our model's probability minus the sportsbook's implied probability. Higher edge = bigger perceived advantage over the market. Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. LOST

"Shota Imanaga's career-level command and control (1.01 WHIP, 1.56 BB/9) give the Cubs a significant pitching advantage over Mlodzinski, whose small 2026 sample and elevated WHIP (1.56) suggest vulnerability."

over under 51% LOW The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
Under 8.5
Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. WON

"Shota Imanaga's career-level command and control (1.01 WHIP, 1.56 BB/9) give the Cubs a significant pitching advantage over Mlodzinski, whose small 2026 sample and elevated WHIP (1.56) suggest vulnerability."

Haiku Current Series Record LLM
moneyline 58% LOW The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
HOME
Edge: -1.0% Our model's probability minus the sportsbook's implied probability. Higher edge = bigger perceived advantage over the market. Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. LOST

"Imanaga's superior career track record and elite WHIP control gives CHC the pitching advantage needed to win at home against a struggling PIT offense."

run line 52% LOW The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
HOME -1.5
Edge: +14.1% Our model's probability minus the sportsbook's implied probability. Higher edge = bigger perceived advantage over the market. Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. LOST

"Imanaga's superior career track record and elite WHIP control gives CHC the pitching advantage needed to win at home against a struggling PIT offense."

over under 65% MED The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
Under 8.5
Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. WON

"Imanaga's superior career track record and elite WHIP control gives CHC the pitching advantage needed to win at home against a struggling PIT offense."

ML Baseline ML
moneyline 36% NO EDGE The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
PIT
Edge: -9.0% Our model's probability minus the sportsbook's implied probability. Higher edge = bigger perceived advantage over the market. Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. WON
run line 57% LOW The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
CHC -1.5
Edge: +19.1% Our model's probability minus the sportsbook's implied probability. Higher edge = bigger perceived advantage over the market. Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. LOST
over under 43% NO EDGE The model's calibrated probability that a prediction is correct (0-100%). Tiers: HIGH (75%+), MED (60-74%), LOW (45-59%), NO EDGE (<45%).
Under 9.0
Market: The implied probability derived from the sportsbook's current betting odds. WON

Odds Comparison

Sportsbook Type Away Home Total
BetMGM moneyline +120 -145
BetMGM over under 6.5 (O -120/U 100)
BetMGM run line -180 (-1.5) +145 (+1.5)
BetOnline.ag moneyline +122 -135
BetOnline.ag over under 6.5 (O -120/U 100)
BetOnline.ag run line -168 (-1.5) +148 (+1.5)
BetRivers moneyline +130 -165
BetRivers over under 6.5 (O -124/U 100)
BetRivers run line -195 (-1.5) +155 (+1.5)
BetUS moneyline +126 -140
BetUS over under 6.5 (O -120/U 100)
BetUS run line -170 (-1.5) +148 (+1.5)
Bovada moneyline +122 -145
Bovada over under 6.5 (O -125/U 105)
Bovada run line -175 (-1.5) +150 (+1.5)
Caesars moneyline +118 -140
Caesars over under 6.5 (O -120/U 100)
Caesars run line -178 (-1.5) +150 (+1.5)
DraftKings moneyline +119 -143
DraftKings over under 6.5 (O -120/U 100)
DraftKings run line -175 (-1.5) +144 (+1.5)
FanDuel moneyline +122 -144
FanDuel over under 6.5 (O -122/U 100)
FanDuel run line -200 (-1.5) +164 (+1.5)
Fanatics moneyline +120 -145
Fanatics over under 6.5 (O -120/U 100)
Fanatics run line -170 (-1.5) +140 (+1.5)
LowVig.ag moneyline +122 -135
LowVig.ag over under 6.5 (O -118/U 103)
LowVig.ag run line -168 (-1.5) +149 (+1.5)
MyBookie.ag moneyline +136 -161
MyBookie.ag over under 6.5 (O -119/U -103)
MyBookie.ag run line -178 (-1.5) +144 (+1.5)

Team Stats

Stats not yet available.